enuntiatio.praefatio.formulae V.
—
GUIDING QUESTIONS
The residency may support inquiry into questions such as:
– What distinguishes artistic research from artistic production, scholarly research, or reflective practice?
– Under which conditions can artistic practice operate as a method of inquiry?
– How do research questions emerge through making, performing, listening, or experimentation?
– What forms of knowledge can be generated through artistic practice?
– How can embodied, tacit, sensory, affective, procedural, or relational knowledge be articulated?
– What constitutes evidence within an artistic research project?
– How are observation, interpretation, speculation, and artistic proposition distinguished?
– How do methods shape what can become perceptible or knowable?
– When can intuition, improvisation, chance, failure, or surprise function as rigorous research operations?
– How should a project respond when its methods generate consequences that contradict its initial assumptions?
– What relation should exist among artistic work, research process, documentation, and exposition?
– How does documentation alter what it attempts to preserve?
– What forms of traceability are appropriate when artistic events cannot be reproduced?
– How do institutions, technologies, disciplines, and funding structures condition artistic research?
– How does the researcher’s position affect access, interpretation, authority, and representation?
– How are knowledge and authorship distributed within collaborative practice?
– What ethical responsibilities arise when artistic research involves other individuals, communities, environments, or archives?
– How can uncertainty be acknowledged without abandoning precision?
– How can research communicate beyond its immediate disciplinary context?
– What is gained and lost when a performance, installation, or sonic process becomes a lecture or article?
– How can writing remain accountable to the specificity of artistic practice?
– What does public presentation contribute to the inquiry?
– When does a research project reach a meaningful stage of completion?
– Which questions should remain open?
These questions are neither exhaustive nor mandatory. They indicate the artistic, epistemological, methodological, historical, ethical, and public dimensions of inquiry that the residency is designed to sustain.
DATES
MENTORS
RESEARCH ORIENTATION
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
PROGRAM STRUCTURE
MODES OF WORK
RESEARCH RIGOR AND RESPONSIBILITY
DOCUMENTATION AS RESEARCH
WRITING AND RESEARCH EXPOSITION
PUBLICATION DEVELOPMENT
GUIDING QUESTIONS
ARTISTIC, RESEARCH, AND PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
POSSIBLE PROJECT FORMS
INTERNATIONAL AND INTERDISCIPLINARY EXCHANGE
WHO THE RESIDENCY IS FOR
WHY PARTICIPATE?
COLLABORATION WITH TEMPO
ANTICIPATED OUTCOMES
APPLICATION
APPLICATION FORM AND
PARTICIPATION FEES
Tempo: The Quarterly Review of New Music [published by Wolke Verlag]
The enuntiatio.praefatio.formulae program is produced by .abeceda Institute
.abeceda [Institute for Research in Art, Critical Thought and Philosophy], a public-benefit NGO and non-profit organisation dedicated to advancing contemporary artistic practices and critical inquiry. Through its innovative programmes, .abeceda has gained international recognition as one of the leading platforms for contemporary music and artistic research in the Adriatic region and across Europe: www.abeceda.io